PRESS RELEASE
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 8 § 1(5), AND ARTICLE 138 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, AS WELL AS OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT SYSTEMICALLY INTERRELATED WITH THE MENTIONED PROVISIONS, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF AT LEAST ONE FIFTH OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF THE DEPUTIES OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
Based on the examination of the case and subject to Article 168(1), Article 169 § 1(2), and Article 170 of the Constitution, as well as guided by Articles 63 , 64 and 68 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court HOLDS:
1. Article 8 § 1(5) of the Constitutional Law on the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly complies with the Constitution by the interpretation that nominating candidates for the positions of the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of the Standing Committee of the National Assembly is not the right but the mandatory power of the competent faction.
2. To declare Article 138 § 5 of the Constitutional Law on the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly contradicting Article 106 § 2 of the Constitution, insofar as it provides for the possibility for the factions of the National Assembly, by mutual agreement, to cede the right to nominate a candidate for the positions of the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of the Standing Committee after determining the right of factions of the National Assembly to nominate candidates for the positions of the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of the Standing Committee.
3. To declare Article 138 § 12 of the Constitutional Law on the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly contradicting Article 106 § 2 of the Constitution.
4. Taking into account the need for the inviolability of legal security, in accordance with Article 170 § 3 of the Constitution, as well as Article 68 §§ 9(4) and 19 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, the deadline for invalidating the provisions declared as contradicting the Constitution by this Decision of the Constitutional Court shall be May 31, 2024, thus enabling the National Assembly to reconcile with this Decision the legal regulations of the Constitutional Law on the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly.
5. Pursuant to Article 170 § 2 of the Constitution, this Decision shall be final and shall enter into force upon its promulgation.
29 January 2025
PRESS RELEASE
27 January 2025
Clarification on the Decision DCC-1729 of the Constitutional Court
20 December 2024
Clarification on the Decision DCC-1691 of the Constitutional Court
3 July 2023
The 2023 Decision of the Armenian Constitutional Court on the Rome Statute
24 January 2025
PROCEDURAL DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
24 January 2025
PROCEDURAL DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
20 December 2024
PROCEDURAL DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
5 December 2024
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S PRESIDENT ARMAN DILANYAN’S INTERVIEW WITH CIVILNET
2 December 2024
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S PRESIDENT ARMAN DILANYAN’S INTERVIEW WITH FACTOR TV
19 December 2024
THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT PARTICIPATED IN THE FIRST OFFICIAL SESSION OF THE COUNCIL OF CHAIRMEN OF THE SUPREME (HIGHEST) COURTS OF THE CIS MEMBER STATES
29 November 2024
STUDENTS OF THE FRENCH UNIVERSITY IN ARMENIA FOUNDATION VISITED THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
The website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia has been created as part of the Partnership for Good Governance (PGG II) Project ''Support to the judicial reform – enhancing the independence and professionalism of the judiciary in Armenia'' co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party.
The upgrade of the official website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as a part of the USAID/Armenia Justice Sector Support Project. The content of this website is the sole responsibility of the Constitutional Court and does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.