ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE LOAN AGREEMENT “CAUCASUS TRANSMISSION NETWORK IV” BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND KREDITANSTALT FÜR WIEDERAUFBAU (KfW)
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PROTOCOL SIGNED ON 24 SEPTEMBER 2025 ON MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF MONGOLIA ON EXEMPTION FROM VISA REQUIREMENTS FOR HOLDERS OF DIPLOMATIC AND OFFICIAL PASSPORTS, SIGNED ON 28 SEPTEMBER 2018
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PARTS 1 AND 2 OF ARTICLE 25, PART 9 OF ARTICLE 27, AND PART 13 OF ARTICLE 44 OF THE LAW “ON HIGHER EDUCATION AND SCIENCE”, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF AT LEAST ONE FIFTH OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DEPUTIES OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE SECRETARIAT OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY REGARDING THE HOSTING OF THE SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES, THE TWELFTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES SERVING AS THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL AND THE SIXTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES SERVING AS THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL, SIGNED ON 26 SEPTEMBER 2025
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PART 3 OF ARTICLE 23 OF THE LAW “ON CIVIL SERVICE”, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF THE RA CASSATION COURT
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 97 OF THE LAW “ON BANKRUPTCY”, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE INTERPRETATION GIVEN TO IT IN LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF “ACBA BANK” OPEN JOINT-STOCK COMPANY
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN ON THE TRANSFER, USE, STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION, SIGNED IN ASTANA ON 21 NOVEMBER 2025
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CHARTER OF THE PEACE COUNCIL
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT ON THE ARMENIA HOUSING RESPONSE AND MORTGAGE MARKET ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON STRATEGIC COOPERATION CONCERNING THE TRUMP ROUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND PROSPERITY (TRIPP), SIGNED IN WASHINGTON ON 1 JUNE 2026, AND IN YEREVAN ON 4 JUNE 2026
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE TRADE IN SERVICES AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, SIGNED ON 5 FEBRUARY 2026
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PROTOCOL ON MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT ON THE PROCEDURE FOR INVESTIGATING INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS INVOLVING WORKERS RESIDING OUTSIDE THE STATE OF EMPLOYMENT, SIGNED ON 5 JUNE 2025
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING INTERNATIONAL CONTROLLED DELIVERY BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES, SIGNED IN DUSHANBE ON 10 OCTOBER 2025
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES, OF THE ONE PART, AND THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, OF THE OTHER PART, SIGNED IN SAINT PETERSBURG ON 21 DECEMBER 2025
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DISPUTE RELATED TO DECISION NO. 259-A OF THE CENTRAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA DATED 14 JUNE 2026, "ON SUMMARIZING THE RESULTS OF THE 7 JUNE 2026 REGULAR ELECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA", RAISED BY THE APPLICATIONS OF THE "STRONG ARMENIA" ALLIANCE OF POLITICAL PARTIES, THE "WINGS OF UNITY" PARTY, THE "DEMOCRACY LAW DISCIPLINE" PARTY, THE "PROSPEROUS ARMENIA" PARTY, THE "FOR THE REPUBLIC ALLIANCE OF DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS" PARTY, THE "ARMENIA" ALLIANCE OF POLITICAL PARTIES, AND THE "NEW POWER" REFORMIST PARTY
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 123 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, INSOFAR AS IT DOES NOT PROVIDE A PROCEDURE FOR THE JOINDER INTO A SINGLE PROCEEDING OF INTERRELATED CASES PENDING BEFORE DIFFERENT JUDGES OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF GENERAL JURISDICTION, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF KNARIK SAHAKYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN ON THE RECIPROCAL ALLOCATION OF LAND PLOTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDINGS OF THE DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN AND OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, SIGNED ON 21 NOVEMBER 2025
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CHARTER OF THE ALLIANCE FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IN ASIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PART 3 OF ARTICLE 237 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND ALSO CONSIDERING ITS INTERPRETATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF ARMANUSH HARUTYUNYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE 2001 UNESCO CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 361 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF SERGE HOVNANIAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 22 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND ALSO CONSIDERING ITS INTERPRETATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF ARMINE TER-AVETISYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 236 OF THE RA CRIMINAL CODE, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF AT LEAST ONE FIFTH OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DEPUTIES OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT NO. CAM 1029 BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ON THE PROVISION OF AN UNCOMMITTED CREDIT FACILITY
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION ON AN INTEGRATED SAFETY, SECURITY AND SERVICE APPROACH AT FOOTBALL MATCHES AND OTHER SPORTS EVENTS, SIGNED IN SAINT-DENIS ON 3 JULY 2016
The website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia has been created as part of the Partnership for Good Governance (PGG II) Project ''Support to the judicial reform – enhancing the independence and professionalism of the judiciary in Armenia'' co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party.
The upgrade of the official website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as a part of the USAID/Armenia Justice Sector Support Project. The content of this website is the sole responsibility of the Constitutional Court and does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.