ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE LOAN AGREEMENT ON SEISMIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (ADDITIONAL FINANCING) BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK SIGNED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT ON FINANCIAL COOPERATION OF 2022 BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY SIGNED ON 16 AUGUST 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 35 § 1(10) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ADOPTED ON 1 JULY 1998 RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF DAVIT POLADYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF BANK GUARANTEES FOR PUBLIC (MUNICIPAL) PROCUREMENT SIGNED ON 29 AUGUST 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PROTOCOL ON MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE TREATY ON THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION OF 29 MAY 2014 IN TERMS OF PROVIDING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BY THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION IN IMPLEMENTING JOINT COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDUSTRIAL SECTORS SIGNED IN MOSCOW ON 25 MAY 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 145 § 1(2) OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW JUDICIAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF AT LEAST ONE FIFTH OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF THE DEPUTIES OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 8 § 1(5), AND ARTICLE 138 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, AS WELL AS OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT SYSTEMICALLY INTERRELATED WITH THE MENTIONED PROVISIONS, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF AT LEAST ONE FIFTH OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF THE DEPUTIES OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 398 § 3 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF ARUSYAK ALEKSANYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PROTOCOL ON AMENDMENTS TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DATED JUNE 21, 2009, EXEMPTING PERSONS WITH DIPLOMATIC PASSPORTS FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN AN ENTRY PERMIT SIGNED ON SEPTEMBER 7
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE LOAN AGREEMENT GREEN, INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE OPEC FUND FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SIGNED ON OCTOBER 3, 2023 AND OCTOBER 23, 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 26 § 1(2) OF THE LAW ON SERVICE IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY BODIES, AND § 3 OF THE SAME ARTICLE (IN THE WORDING IN FORCE PRIOR TO THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE LAW HO-131-N OF MARCH 25, 2021) RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF LEVON HARUTYUNYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PROTOCOL BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRIA ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE READMISSION OF PERSONS RESIDING WITHOUT AUTHORISATION SIGNED IN VIENNA ON 18 JULY 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE MULTILATERAL COMPETENT AUTHORITY AGREEMENT ON THE EXCHANGE OF COUNTRY-BY-COUNTRY REPORTS SIGNED ON 27 JANUARY 2016
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION OF MEMBER STATES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES IN THE AREA OF DOCUMENTING PERSONS SUBJECT TO FORCED DEPORTATION WITH RETURN CERTIFICATES
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF ACADEMIC DEGREES IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION MEMBER STATES SIGNED IN SOCHI ON 8 JUNE 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 344 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF RUBEN GRIGORYAN AND GOHAR GALSTYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION AND MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CUSTOMS MATTERS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA SIGNED IN BRUSSELS ON 23 JUNE 2023
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE MULTILATERAL COMPETENT AUTHORITY AGREEMENT ON AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION SIGNED ON 14 OCTOBER 2014
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE UNIVERSAL POSTAL CONVENTION
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE POSTAL PAYMENT SERVICE AGREEMENT
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PROTOCOL NO. 13 TO THE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS, CONCERNING THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, SIGNED IN VILNIUS ON 3 MAY 2002
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 317 § 2, AND ARTICLE 337 § 1 OF THE CIVIL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF SUSANNA BAZIKYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AGREEMENT WITH THE EXCHANGE OF NOTES ON ESTABLISHING LOCAL OFFICES OF THE GERMAN AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION GMBH (GIZ) AND KFW DEVELOPMENT BANK SIGNED IN YEREVAN ON 13 DECEMBER 2022
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 35 § 1 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW JUDICIAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, AND ARTICLE 3 § 1(1) OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA INSOFAR AS IT PROVIDES FOR AN APPEAL TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AGAINST THE DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCIL MADE IN THE EXERCISE OF POWERS ENVISAGED BY ARTCLE 175 § 1(1-4) OF THE CONSTITUTION, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 290 § 1 OF THE RA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE ADOPTED ON 1 JULY 1998, INSOFAR AS IT FAILS TO ENVISAGE THE RESTRAINT MEASURE SUBSCRIPTION ON RECOGNIZANCE TO BE DIRECTLY SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS, RAISED BY THE APPLICATION OF HAYK MAMIJANYAN
The website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia has been created as part of the Partnership for Good Governance (PGG II) Project ''Support to the judicial reform – enhancing the independence and professionalism of the judiciary in Armenia'' co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party.
The upgrade of the official website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as a part of the USAID/Armenia Justice Sector Support Project. The content of this website is the sole responsibility of the Constitutional Court and does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.