ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED BY THE FINANCING AGREEMENT TAX ADMINISTRATION MODERNIZATION PROJECT SIGNED BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ON 9 JULY 2012 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED BY THE PROTOCOL ON AMENDING THE AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION IN THE DOMAIN OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF HYDRO POWER STATION ON THE RIVER ARAKS SIGNED ON 23 DECEMBER 2011 IN YEREVAN BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 305, PARTS 3 AND 4 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CITIZEN KAREN MEZHLUMYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED BY THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT BORDER CROSSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE / MODERNIZATION OF BAGRATASHEN, BAVRA AND GOGAVAN BORDER CROSSING POINTS / (TOGETHER WITH THE AMENDMENTS TO NO. 1 AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT LETTER SIGNED BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK ON 5 NOVEMBER 2012 IN YEREVAN) SIGNED BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK ON 7 AUGUST 2012 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 36, PARTS 2 AND 3 OF THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF ASATRYANNERI SAKHA LENA CJSC
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 379, PART 1, POINT 3 AND ARTICLE 380, PARTS 1 AND 2 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CITIZEN GAYANE ASHUGHYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 17 OF THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON FINANCIAL SYSTEM MEDIATOR WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 35, PART 6, PARAGRAPH 1 AND PART 9, PARAGRAPH 1, ARTICLE 41, PART 2, POINT 3 OF THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON STATE PENSIONS WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 204.32, POINT 1 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CITIZEN GRIGORI VAHANYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 169.8 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CITIZEN ARTAK GHAZARYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT ON YEREVAN METRO REHABILITATION PROJECT SIGNED BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT ON AUGUST 3, 2012 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE AGREEMENT ON THE ORDER OF REVIEW OF THE DEGREE OF SECRECY OF INFORMATION CLASSIFIED DURING THE PERIOD OF EXISTENCE OF THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS SIGNED ON OCTOBER 18, 2012 IN ST. PETERSBURG WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE AGREEMENT ON INTERNATIONALLY WANTED PERSONS (WITH RESERVATIONS) SIGNED BY THE STATE-MEMBERS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES IN MOSCOW, ON DECEMBER 10, 2010 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE AGREEMENT ON THE ORDER OF HAND-OVER OF THE SAMPLES OF DRUGS, PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AND THEIR PRECURSORS (WITH RESERVATIONS AND OBJECTIONS) SIGNED IN SAINT-PETERSBURG, ON OCTOBER 18, 2011 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE AMENDMENTS MADE IN THE PROTOCOL ON THE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COUNCIL OF HEADS OF MIGRATION BODIES OF THE STATE-MEMBERS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE INDEPENDENT STATES OF OCTOBER 5, 2007, SIGNED IN MOSCOW, ON DECEMBER 10, 2010 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE CONVENTION ON TRANSIT TRADE OF LAND-LOCKED STATES SIGNED IN NEW YORK, ON JULY 8, 1965 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE AMENDMENTS ADOPTED BY THE DECISION NO. 131 BY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE BLACK SEA TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION IN TIRANA ON JUNE19, 2011 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED IN THE AGREEMENT ON AMENDMENTS MADE IN THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT ON ARMENIA-YEREVAN METRO REHABILITATION PHASE I SIGNED BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK ON MARCH 12, 2012 AND MARCH 12, 2012 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED BY SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS SIGNED ON MARCH 28, 2006 WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 14 OF THE LABOUR CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF CITIZEN GALUST SHIRINYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF ARTICLE 208, PART 2 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICATION OF CITIZEN NELLY MKRTCHYAN
ON THE CASE CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUE REGARDING THE CONFORMITY OF THE OBLIGATIONS STIPULATED BY THE AGREEMENT ON FREE TRADE ZONE SIGNED ON 18 OCTOBER 2011 IN SAINT PETERSBURG WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
ON THE CASE ON CHALLENGING THE DECISION 37-A OF THE TERRITORIAL ELECTION COMMISSION N 7 DATED 11 MAY 2012 CONCERNING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA BY MAJORITARIAN ORDER DATED 6 MAY 2012
ON THE CASE ON CHALLENGING THE DECISION 41-A OF THE TERRITORIAL ELECTION COMMISSION N 17 DATED 11 MAY 2012 CONCERNING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA BY MAJORITARIAN ORDER DATED 6 MAY 2012
The website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia has been created as part of the Partnership for Good Governance (PGG II) Project ''Support to the judicial reform – enhancing the independence and professionalism of the judiciary in Armenia'' co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of either party.
The upgrade of the official website of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as a part of the USAID/Armenia Justice Sector Support Project. The content of this website is the sole responsibility of the Constitutional Court and does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.